Skip to content

Should we define a quantity Arbitrary or is Dimensionless enough? #174

@keilw

Description

@keilw

#173 and #59 point to missing UCUM units like ARBITRARY_UNIT. The UCUM catalog defines these as quantity type "arbitrary", should we add a quantity type Artitrary or is Dimensionless enough?
There are other types like "arbitrary biologic activity" so the question is, if those could all use "arbitrary" or should have their own types often used for just one or two units? Or do we stick to Dimensionless for all of them?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions