Support for QUIC/HTTP3?

[Eric24]

I've seen a few issues and discussions that touch on support for QUIC/HTTP3. I just wanted to ask if this was actively being worked on, something being considered for the future, or not something that will likely ever happen.

[uNetworkingAB]

For the right price, probabilities can approach 100%

[Eric24]

That's fine, what's the right price? And what kind of effort would it be in terms of time?

[Eric24]

I sent an email to your github.barrel329 address. Please let me know when you'd like to discuss this project.

[Eric24]

@uNetworkingAB - Would you like to discuss a paid project for adding QUIC support? Maybe I misunderstood your original comment, but I thought you were offering to do this "for the right price". If so, I'd like to engage you to do that. It's not time-critical at the moment, but is something I'd like to have later this year.

[guest271314]

Here's HTTP/3 implemented for Node.js using node-add-on API for free https://github.com/fails-components/webtransport.

[Eric24]

I have nothing against WebTransport or any technology in general; it's simply a matter of what we currently have experience with. uWebSockets "just works", while WebTransport (or even other WebSocket implementations) are unknowns.

[guest271314]

WebTransport is over HTTP/3 (QUIC over UDP). uWebSockets doesn't have an HTTP/3 solution as it stands, so this is an unknown, too.

[Eric24]

That is true.

[guest271314]

The last thing I do in the technology domain is entertain preferences. Anyway, good luck!

[uNetworkingAB]

uWS has experimental HTTP3 with performance numbers posted https://medium.com/@unetworkingab/h3-meet-node-js-1d952e9bdd74

This is not the venue to make arguments against potential customers, which is why I've put a ban on your account.