You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 6, 2025. It is now read-only.
I was examining the tapas_hgf_ar1_binary_mab function, which implements the HGF for multi-armed bandit scenarios with binary outcomes. I noticed that the variational Bayes update equations in this implementation differ from those in your 2014 paper, "Uncertainty in perception and the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter".
Specifically, the differences are reflected in the parameters, particularly with the ar1 component introducing autoregression in the dynamics of the second level, characterized by ϕ and m, unlike tapas_hgf_binary_mab, which uses a single drift parameter p.
Could you please guide me to the reference or paper where these updated equations, particularly for the ar1 extension, are derived?