Generic transports #2674
roshanrags
started this conversation in
Ideas
Generic transports
#2674
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Yes, it is planned for 0.8: #2479 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Perfect, thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It seems like TcpListener/TcpStream are pretty deeply embedded in the current high level APIs. I know the serve-with-hyper example exists, but it seems to essentially be copying (axum internals?)
into_futurejust to get a few customization points. It is also something that would need periodic updating asinto_futuregets more and more sophisticated.Are generic transports something you would be interested in? The goal would basically be so users can supply their own listeners and/or streams to high level APIs and have axum run transparently on top of them.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions