Replies: 2 comments
-
0.9 included a version bump of the backing XeTeX engine, as well as xdvipdfmx. I can try to investigate when I have the chance whether the slowdown appears to be part of a change to tectonic, or to the backing engine. If it's part of the Rust code of Tectonic I'll try to fix it. If not, eventually the port to Rust initiative should reach the XeTeX engine, at which point I can look into optimizing it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Thanks for looking into this. 🙏 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
For years, I have been using Tectonic 0.8.2 because it is the last "fast" version. Since version 0.9.0, the compilation speed has significantly dropped. Interestingly, the speed of version 0.7.1 was even better than 0.8.2, but unfortunately, I can no longer use this version due to the following error:
This brings up another issue: one of the main goals of Tectonic is to be reproducible. However, we can't use old versions anymore because the package repository is no longer available.
I have tested different versions with Hyperfine under Windows using the following bash script:
The results are as follows:
I tested this with a "real" LaTeX document that produces 4 pages with one logo.
My questions are:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions