问题描述
- tbox中uuid的性能太差了，考虑到性能我重写了uuid的功能，新的uuid的功能性能在跑一亿次的输出uuid,原生的uuid运行时间为751.416秒，重写后uuid运行时间是8.861秒。优化后的性能提升84倍。下面是参照基于运行时间的整体测试
测试机器配置
tbox原始uuid性能测试
/*************************************************************************
> File Name: uuid_main.c
> Author:perrynzhou
> Mail:perrynzhou@gmail.com
> Created Time: Wed 18 Jun 2025 10:59:16 AM CST
************************************************************************/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <tbox/hash/uuid.h>
#include <tbox/prefix/type.h>
#define UUID_SIZE 37
inline static FILE *init_dump_file(const char *path)
{
if (path == NULL)
{
return tb_null;
}
return fopen(path, "aw+");
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
if (argc <= 1)
{
fprintf(stdout, "usage: %s {loop_count} {dump_file}\n", argv[0]);
return -1;
}
char *ptr = NULL;
uint64_t cnt = strtol(argv[1], &ptr, 10);
tb_char_t data[UUID_SIZE] = {'\0'};
FILE *fp = init_dump_file(argv[2]);
if (fp == tb_null)
{
for (uint64_t i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
{
tb_uuid_make_cstr(data, tb_null);
}
}
else
{
for (uint64_t i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
{
const tb_char_t *uuid = tb_uuid_make_cstr(data, tb_null);
fprintf(fp, "%s\n", (tb_char_t *)&data);
}
fclose(fp);
}
fprintf(stdout, "******************************\n");
return 0;
}
改造后tbox uuid性能测试
- 重写了tbox/src/hash/uuid的功能后进行测试，下面是测试代码
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
if (argc < 2)
{
fprintf(stdout, "usage: %s {uuid_count} {uuid_dump_file_path}\n");
return -1;
}
char *ptr = 0;
uint64_t cnt = strtol(argv[1], &ptr, 10);
tb_uuid_t uid;
tb_uuid_init(&uid);
tb_char_t uuid_str[37];
if (argv[2] != tb_null)
{
remove(argv[2]);
}
FILE *fp = fopen(argv[2], "a+");
if (fp != tb_null)
{
for (uint64_t i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
{
tb_char_t *str = tb_uuid_make(&uid, 4, &uuid_str);
fprintf(fp, "%s\n", str);
}
fclose(fp);
}
else
{
for (uint64_t i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
{
tb_uuid_make(&uid, 4, &uuid_str);
}
}
tb_uuid_exit(&uid);
}
是否可以发起PR?
- 重构后的性能提升非常明显，这个是否可以发起一个pr？发起pr流程是怎样的呢？
