Use different naming scheme for --font-weight-* and --radius-*?

[xNyfPtx]

--font-weight-thin: 100;
--font-weight-extralight: 200;
--font-weight-light: 300;
--font-weight-normal: 400;
--font-weight-medium: 500;
--font-weight-semibold: 600;
--font-weight-bold: 700;
--font-weight-extrabold: 800;
--font-weight-black: 900;

--radius-xs: 0.125rem;
--radius-sm: 0.25rem;
--radius-md: 0.375rem;
--radius-lg: 0.5rem;
--radius-xl: 0.75rem;
--radius-2xl: 1rem;
--radius-3xl: 1.5rem;
--radius-4xl: 2rem;

Why not just use rounded-* instead of radius-* and font-* instead of font-weight-* to make it correspond to the classes?

Shameless self-promo: TailwindCSS classes as variables / design tokens. It could possibly help as I keep most of the tailwind classes as variables which could better improve the css variables from tailwindcss v4.

[adamwathan]

We already use font-* for the font-family utilities and each variable namespace needs to be unique otherwise things are ambiguous.

For --radius-* it's because we're considering renaming those utilities and including rounded-* just for backward compatibility:

#14912