Skip to content

range of dcterms:relation subproperties #13

@rob-metalinkage

Description

@rob-metalinkage

dcterms:relation
rdf:type rdf:Property ;
dcterms:description "Recommended best practice is to identify the related resource by means of a string conforming to a formal identification system. "@en-us ;
rdfs:subPropertyOf http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/relation ;
skos:note "This term is intended to be used with non-literal values as defined in the DCMI Abstract Model (http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/). As of December 2007, the DCMI Usage Board is seeking a way to express this intention with a formal range declaration."@en-us ;
.

The DCMI has a lot of stuff but is unclear about this.

DCAT version 2 has things like dct:source "DataCite resource types"@en ; which probably doesnt match.

it seems that forcing ^^xsd:anyURI is too strict and a proper URI should be allowed, and the spec allows strings in general.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions