Title: How does SP1 handle recursive proof composition and are there any performance trade-offs? #2380
Unanswered
quietBlockchain
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I’ve been exploring the zkVM ecosystem recently and wanted to learn more about how SP1 approaches recursive proof composition.
Does SP1 currently support recursive proofs out of the box, or is that still under development?
And if supported, are there any benchmarks or documentation on the performance trade-offs (e.g., proof size, proving time, verifier cost)?
Understanding how recursion is handled would be helpful in exploring more advanced ZK applications using SP1.
Thanks in advance!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions