Replies: 3 comments 11 replies
-
I'm not sure I follow what do you mean with negative lag here. Maybe you can provide more details or some examples? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
7 replies
-
@urton negative lag on target topic only happens when the partition is empty, and we start MM2 (KAFKA-12635). The theory is that the target CG offset is set to the same numerical value of the source partition (X) instead of 0. This is not updated until the actual target CG offset is greater than X. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We recently started a migration from a traditional self-managed Apache Kafka cluster to Strimzi. We enabled group offset sync and something I'm struggling to fully understand is why the mirrored group has a current-offset matching (or close to matching) the source offset, but then the log-end-offset essentially starts over resulting in a negative lag. Is this just aesthetic? The lag is slowly moving closer to 0 but some of our negative lags are very "large". Several hundred million. I verified all the data has moved over, but I'm struggling on this lag issue.
Any help clearing this up is much appreciated!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions