docs: replace manual for loop in examples

[hrshya]

Resolves none .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• replaces manual for loop in examples for stats/base/dists/binomial/mgf, stats/base/dists/binomial/mode, stats/base/dists/binomial/pmf, stats/base/dists/binomial/quantile, stats/base/dists/binomial/skewness, stats/base/dists/binomial/stdev and stats/base/dists/binomial/variance packages.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

• resolves no related issues.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
stats/base/dists/binomial/mgf	$\color{green}246/246$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}23/23$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}3/3$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}246/246$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/binomial/mode	$\color{green}177/177$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}12/12$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}177/177$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/binomial/pmf	$\color{green}287/287$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}44/44$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}3/3$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}287/287$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/binomial/quantile	$\color{red}430/432$ $\color{green}+99.54\%$	$\color{red}59/60$ $\color{green}+98.33\%$	$\color{green}5/5$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{red}430/432$ $\color{green}+99.54\%$
stats/base/dists/binomial/skewness	$\color{green}177/177$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}12/12$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}177/177$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/binomial/stdev	$\color{green}177/177$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}12/12$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}177/177$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/binomial/variance	$\color{green}176/176$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}12/12$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}176/176$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[kgryte]

This isn't correct. p should be a probability and not discrete.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.

[kgryte]

Same comment.