Unable to locate run_first.py and streamlit_app.py while setting Resume-Matcher codebase

[VSCODER00]

*Describe the bug
Cloned the repository, unable to find the run_first.py and streamlit_app.py files

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Clone the repository using git clone https://github.com/srbhr/Resume-Matcher.git
2. Navigate to the project folder.
3. Look for run_first.py and streamlit_app.py files
4. Files are not found in the root directory or subfolders

Expected behavior
I expected to find run_first.py and streamlit_app.py files in the repository to run the application as described in the documentation.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• OS: Ubuntu 22.04
• Browser: N/A
• Version: N/A

Additional context
I have checked the repository thoroughly, including all folders and branches. The files mentioned in the documentation are not present. Could you please confirm if these files were removed, renamed, or are in a different branch?

[sonianuj287]

Hi @VSCODER00 ,

If those files used to exist and were accidentally removed, I can add minimal, documented stubs (run_first.py that sets up environment variables and streamlit_app.py that starts the app) so the repo can be quickly run locally.

If the maintainers prefer not to add stubs, I can instead update the README with precise setup/run commands and example python invocations and Docker/venv instructions so new contributors can get started.

I’m happy to submit a small PR for either approach — which would you prefer? (If you want the stub files, any naming/behavior conventions I should follow?) Thanks!

[sonianuj287]

Hi @VSCODER00 ,

If those files used to exist and were accidentally removed, I can add minimal, documented stubs (run_first.py that sets up environment variables and streamlit_app.py that starts the app) so the repo can be quickly run locally.

If the maintainers prefer not to add stubs, I can instead update the README with precise setup/run commands and example python invocations and Docker/venv instructions so new contributors can get started.

I’m happy to submit a small PR for either approach — which would you prefer? (If you want the stub files, any naming/behavior conventions I should follow?) Thanks!

@survivant @atarora @iHirenDev @Sayvai

[VSCODER00]

Hi @sonianuj287,
Thanks for the quick response!
I'm fine with either approach, whichever the maintainers feel fits better.
Personally, I think adding minimal stubs would really help new users get started quickly without confusion.
Thanks again for offering to fix this.

[sonianuj287]

Hi @VSCODER00 @srbhr , please review this code and suggest me changes
Thanks :)