Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
I'm not sure what you mean exactly, but I'm open for a PR around this. If the implementation is clean and the PR contains tests, I'll consider merging it in. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It is nice to be able to fluently tap
->ray()in a collection using theray()collection macro.It would be nice to expand this to models.
Currently, when a collection contains models, using
->ray()often does not help because it is not possible to inspect deeply nested elements like#attributes: array:7 [ …7]Would it be possible to use
model()(orray_model()to prevent name conflict) in the same way asray()on a collection?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions