Skip to content

Vocabularies and schemata you may wanna compatible with #18

@k00ni

Description

@k00ni

@opyh: As we discussed; here is some input from my side.

During my research i found the following vocabularies and schemata, which may be of interest for a11y-json.

Linked Open Data / RDF

Side note: In the Linked Open Data / Semantic Web community it is common that you try to reuse existing schemata / ontologies / vocabularies. In practice its hard to follow it all the time, because sometimes existing models/properties/classes don't fit your current use case 100%. We should take a deeper look in this space to spot further sources. Chances are high that other repositories may also using this, which automatically increases compatibility.

Common data specifications/vocabularies

About the dbpedia

Its an important data source and -reference in the Linked Open Data / RDF community. If an use case is about something in the Wikipedia, related DBpedia resources will be used. That is a common way to find consensus and similarities in data and concepts. I can help here. A big advantage: If a11y-json resources reference DBpedia entries and are transformed to RDF, related data can be merged very easily.

Further information:

  • Overviews here and here
  • Paper about DBpedia with more details, technical information and its history

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions