"Error: Transaction reverted: function selector was not recognized and there's no fallback function" Front End development

[Aishwaria8786]

I was following Patrick's tutorial on "How to connect your smart contract to metamask" and I faced this error in hardhat simple storage. Metamask confirms the store but in terminal the following is shown. I don't understand what is wrong. Please suggest a solution.I faced the same issue in fund me project.

  Contract call:       SimpleStorage#<unrecognized-selector>
  From:                0xf39fd6e51aad88f6f4ce6ab8827279cfffb92266
  To:                  0x5fbdb2315678afecb367f032d93f642f64180aa3

  Error: Transaction reverted: function selector was not recognized and there's no fallback function
      at SimpleStorage.<unrecognized-selector> (contracts/SimpleStorage.sol:9)
      at HardhatNode.runCall (/home/aish123/hh-fcc/hardhat-simple-storage/node_modules/hardhat/src/internal/hardhat-network/provider/node.ts:535:20)
      at EthModule._callAction (/home/aish123/hh-fcc/hardhat-simple-storage/node_modules/hardhat/src/internal/hardhat-network/provider/modules/eth.ts:353:9)
      at HardhatNetworkProvider._sendWithLogging (/home/aish123/hh-fcc/hardhat-simple-storage/node_modules/hardhat/src/internal/hardhat-network/provider/provider.ts:138:22)
      at HardhatNetworkProvider.request (/home/aish123/hh-fcc/hardhat-simple-storage/node_modules/hardhat/src/internal/hardhat-network/provider/provider.ts:115:18)
      at JsonRpcHandler._handleRequest (/home/aish123/hh-fcc/hardhat-simple-storage/node_modules/hardhat/src/internal/hardhat-network/jsonrpc/handler.ts:188:20)
      at JsonRpcHandler._handleSingleRequest (/home/aish123/hh-fcc/hardhat-simple-storage/node_modules/hardhat/src/internal/hardhat-network/jsonrpc/handler.ts:167:17)
      at Server.JsonRpcHandler.handleHttp (/home/aish123/hh-fcc/hardhat-simple-storage/node_modules/hardhat/src/internal/hardhat-network/jsonrpc/handler.ts:52:21)

eth_blockNumber
eth_getBlockByNumber
eth_feeHistory```

[alymurtazamemon]

@Aishwaria8786 Please check it out this discussion #315