Skip to content

Licensing? #6

@cbarrett

Description

@cbarrett

Would you be open to something more like the LGPL (I think there's an equivalent for the AGPL)? This would effectively allow closed-source clients of this as a library, but any downstream modifications or improvements to the library itself would have to be shared back with upstream. (IANAL.)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions