Sliced Wasserstein distance vs Wasserstein distance #87
                  
                    
                      shiqingzhangCSU
                    
                  
                
                  started this conversation in
                General
              
            Replies: 1 comment
-
| 
         Yes the Sliced Wasserstein distance is much faster to compute and it approximates the Wasserstein distance. You can increase the parameter   | 
  
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
        
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I think your job is very meaningful and exciting!But I am a little confused about the description of Sliced Wasserstein distance.
"The general idea is to compute an approximation of the Wasserstein distance by computing the distance in 1-dimension repeatedly and use the results as a measure. "
Does this mean that Sliced Wasserstein distance is faster than Wasserstein in terms of time complexity?
If not, what is the difference between these two distances in this library?
Thank you for your attention!
Looking forward to your reply!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions