jobs.lookup_jid is too verbose if cmd.script was used - filtering options please? #67266
Replies: 3 comments
-
So instead something like this... where only stdout is shown?
I actually don't know maybe using a different out-putter can achieve this but otherwise it would be a feature request. But, I'll ping @saltstack/team-core in case there already is something built in to achieve this. :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes that exactly, or some means to filter like maybe;
That would allow a bit more granular control as some folks might want something other than stdout, or more than just stdout but not everything.... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Discussed with team-core 1/24/2020 at this time the core team will keep this in the backlog as lower priority and the community is welcome to submit a PR or use as suggested ^^ to use a filter. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Calling the output when using CLI will always produce stuff that we don't really care to see at the point in time (pid, retcode, stderr);
Could a way to filter this output be added to jobs.lookup_jid?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions