Small grammar fixes

Author: SomeoneToIgnore

docs/dev/architecture.md

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ The underlying engine makes sure that model is computed lazily (on-demand) and c
 ## Entry Points
 
 `crates/rust-analyzer/src/bin/main.rs` contains the main function which spawns LSP.
-This is *the* entry point, but it front-loads a lot of complexity, so its fine to just skim through it.
+This is *the* entry point, but it front-loads a lot of complexity, so it's fine to just skim through it.
 
 `crates/rust-analyzer/src/handlers.rs` implements all LSP requests and is a great place to start if you are already familiar with LSP.
 
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ They are handled by Rust code in the xtask directory.
 
 VS Code plugin.
 
-### `libs/`
+### `lib/`
 
 rust-analyzer independent libraries which we publish to crates.io.
 It's not heavily utilized at the moment.
@@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ If an AST method returns an `Option`, it *can* be `None` at runtime, even if thi
 ### `crates/base_db`
 
 We use the [salsa](https://github.com/salsa-rs/salsa) crate for incremental and on-demand computation.
-Roughly, you can think of salsa as a key-value store, but it can also compute derived values using specified functions. The `base_db` crate provides basic infrastructure for interacting with salsa.
+Roughly, you can think of salsa as a key-value store, but it can also compute derived values using specified functions. 
+The `base_db` crate provides basic infrastructure for interacting with salsa.
 Crucially, it defines most of the "input" queries: facts supplied by the client of the analyzer.
 Reading the docs of the `base_db::input` module should be useful: everything else is strictly derived from those inputs.
 
@@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ Internally, `ide` is split across several crates. `ide_assists`, `ide_completion
 The `ide` contains a public API/façade, as well as implementation for a plethora of smaller features.
 
 **Architecture Invariant:** `ide` crate strives to provide a _perfect_ API.
-Although at the moment it has only one consumer, the LSP server, LSP *does not* influence it's API design.
+Although at the moment it has only one consumer, the LSP server, LSP *does not* influence its API design.
 Instead, we keep in mind a hypothetical _ideal_ client -- an IDE tailored specifically for rust, every nook and cranny of which is packed with Rust-specific goodies.
 
 ### `crates/rust-analyzer`
@@ -307,7 +308,7 @@ This sections talks about the things which are everywhere and nowhere in particu
 
 ### Code generation
 
-Some of the components of this repository are generated through automatic processes.
+Some ]components in this repository are generated through automatic processes.
 Generated code is updated automatically on `cargo test`.
 Generated code is generally committed to the git repository.
 

docs/dev/lsp-extensions.md

@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ interface SnippetTextEdit extends TextEdit {
 
 ```typescript
 export interface TextDocumentEdit {
-	textDocument: OptionalVersionedTextDocumentIdentifier;
-	edits: (TextEdit | SnippetTextEdit)[];
+    textDocument: OptionalVersionedTextDocumentIdentifier;
+    edits: (TextEdit | SnippetTextEdit)[];
 }
 ```
 
@@ -145,9 +145,9 @@ mod foo;
 ### Unresolved Question
 
 * An alternative would be to use a more general "gotoSuper" request, which would work for super methods, super classes and super modules.
-  This is the approach IntelliJ Rust is takeing.
+  This is the approach IntelliJ Rust is taking.
   However, experience shows that super module (which generally has a feeling of navigation between files) should be separate.
-  If you want super module, but the cursor happens to be inside an overriden function, the behavior with single "gotoSuper" request is surprising.
+  If you want super module, but the cursor happens to be inside an overridden function, the behavior with single "gotoSuper" request is surprising.
 
 ## Join Lines
 
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ fn main() {
 ### Unresolved Question
 
 * What is the position of the cursor after `joinLines`?
-  Currently this is left to editor's discretion, but it might be useful to specify on the server via snippets.
+  Currently, this is left to editor's discretion, but it might be useful to specify on the server via snippets.
   However, it then becomes unclear how it works with multi cursor.
 
 ## On Enter
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ Moreover, it would be cool if editors didn't need to implement even basic langua
 
 ### Unresolved Question
 
-* Should we return a a nested brace structure, to allow paredit-like actions of jump *out* of the current brace pair?
+* Should we return a nested brace structure, to allow paredit-like actions of jump *out* of the current brace pair?
   This is how `SelectionRange` request works.
 * Alternatively, should we perhaps flag certain `SelectionRange`s as being brace pairs?
 
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ Expands macro call at a given position.
 This request is sent from client to server to render "inlay hints" -- virtual text inserted into editor to show things like inferred types.
 Generally, the client should re-query inlay hints after every modification.
 Note that we plan to move this request to `experimental/inlayHints`, as it is not really Rust-specific, but the current API is not necessary the right one.
-Upstream issue: https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/956
+Upstream issues: https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/issues/956 , https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/2797
 
 **Request:**
 

docs/dev/style.md

@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@ https://www.tedinski.com/2018/02/06/system-boundaries.html
 ## Crates.io Dependencies
 
 We try to be very conservative with usage of crates.io dependencies.
-Don't use small "helper" crates (exception: `itertools` is allowed).
+Don't use small "helper" crates (exception: `itertools` and `either` are allowed).
 If there's some general reusable bit of code you need, consider adding it to the `stdx` crate.
-A useful exercise is to read Cargo.lock and see if some of the *transitive* dependencies do not make sense for rust-analyzer.
+A useful exercise is to read Cargo.lock and see if some *transitive* dependencies do not make sense for rust-analyzer.
 
 **Rationale:** keep compile times low, create ecosystem pressure for faster compiles, reduce the number of things which might break.
 
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ When implementing `do_thing`, it might be very useful to create a context object
 
 ```rust
 pub fn do_thing(arg1: Arg1, arg2: Arg2) -> Res {
-    let mut ctx = Ctx { arg1, arg2 }
+    let mut ctx = Ctx { arg1, arg2 };
     ctx.run()
 }
 
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ use super::{}
 
 **Rationale:** consistency.
 Reading order is important for new contributors.
-Grouping by crate allows to spot unwanted dependencies easier.
+Grouping by crate allows spotting unwanted dependencies easier.
 
 ## Import Style
 
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ assert!(x < y);
 assert!(x > 0);
 
 // BAD
-assert!(x >= lo && x <= hi>);
+assert!(x >= lo && x <= hi);
 assert!(r1 < l2 || l1 > r2);
 assert!(y > x);
 assert!(0 > x);

docs/dev/syntax.md

@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ Another alternative (used by swift and roslyn) is to explicitly divide the set o
 
 ```rust
 struct Token {
-    kind: NonTriviaTokenKind
+    kind: NonTriviaTokenKind,
     text: String,
     leading_trivia: Vec<TriviaToken>,
     trailing_trivia: Vec<TriviaToken>,
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ impl SyntaxNode {
             let child_offset = offset;
             offset += green_child.text_len;
             Arc::new(SyntaxData {
-                offset: child_offset;
+                offset: child_offset,
                 parent: Some(Arc::clone(self)),
                 green: Arc::clone(green_child),
             })
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ impl SyntaxNode {
 }
 
 impl PartialEq for SyntaxNode {
-    fn eq(&self, other: &SyntaxNode) {
+    fn eq(&self, other: &SyntaxNode) -> bool {
         self.offset == other.offset
             && Arc::ptr_eq(&self.green, &other.green)
     }
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ This is OK because trees traversals mostly (always, in case of rust-analyzer) ru
 The other thread can restore the `SyntaxNode` by traversing from the root green node and looking for a node with specified range.
 You can also use the similar trick to store a `SyntaxNode`.
 That is, a data structure that holds a `(GreenNode, Range<usize>)` will be `Sync`.
-However rust-analyzer goes even further.
+However, rust-analyzer goes even further.
 It treats trees as semi-transient and instead of storing a `GreenNode`, it generally stores just the id of the file from which the tree originated: `(FileId, Range<usize>)`.
 The `SyntaxNode` is the restored by reparsing the file and traversing it from root.
 With this trick, rust-analyzer holds only a small amount of trees in memory at the same time, which reduces memory usage.