We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
2 parents 6e3283d + 3709d18 commit e154d0fCopy full SHA for e154d0f
text/1884-unstable-sort.md
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ A: Because stability is a good default. A programmer might call a sort function
54
without checking in the documentation whether it is stable or unstable. It is very
55
intuitive to assume stability, so having `slice::sort` perform unstable sorting might
56
cause unpleasant surprises.
57
-See this [story](https://medium.com/@cocotutch/a-swift-sorting-problem-e0ebfc4e46d4#.yfvsgjozx)
+See this [story](https://web.archive.org/web/20181006113551/https://medium.com/@topLayoutGuide/a-swift-sorting-problem-e0ebfc4e46d4)
58
for an example.
59
60
**Q: Why does `slice::sort` allocate?**<br>
0 commit comments