We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
2 parents 0e6ebf0 + 6451245 commit 68e3b4dCopy full SHA for 68e3b4d
text/2497-if-let-chains.md
@@ -1687,7 +1687,7 @@ the proposed syntax in this RFC to work.
1687
[Appendix B.2]: #appendix-b2
1688
1689
Many participants in the survey opined that the proposed syntax was consistent
1690
-with current Rust. They though that this was positive.
+with current Rust. They thought that this was positive.
1691
1692
1. > It is the *only* option consistent with what we have today and expect once we learn about `let PATTERN = EXPR`.
1693
0 commit comments