You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/authoring.md
+30Lines changed: 30 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -75,6 +75,36 @@ Rules can be linked to by their ID using markdown such as `[foo.bar]`. There are
75
75
76
76
In the HTML, the rules are clickable just like headers.
77
77
78
+
When assigning rules to new paragraphs, or when modifying rule names, use the following guidelines:
79
+
1. A rule applies to one core idea, which should be easily determined when reading the paragraph it is applied to,
80
+
2. Other than the "intro" paragraph, purely explanatory, expository, or exemplary content does not need a rule. If the expository paragraph isn't directly related to the previous, separate it with a hard (rendered) line break
81
+
3. Rust Code examples and tests do not need their own rules
82
+
4. Notes do not need rules. For other admonition types, use the following guidelines:
83
+
* Warning: Omit the rule if and only if the warning follows from the previous paragraph.
84
+
* Target Specific Behaviour: Always include the rule
85
+
* Edition Differences: Always include the rule
86
+
* Version History: Omit the rule if the present behaviour is explained in the immediately preceeding rule.
87
+
4. The following keywords should be used to identify paragraphs when unambiguous:
88
+
*`intro`: The beginning paragraph of each section - should explain the construct being defined overall.
89
+
*`syntax`: Syntax definitions or explanations when BNF syntax definitions are not used
90
+
*`restriction`: Syntactic (parsing) requirements on the construct
91
+
*`constraint`: Semantic (type checking) requirements on the construct
92
+
*`safety` (instead of restriction): Stating that an operation is `unsafe` or the conditions under which it is `unsafe`
93
+
*`behavior`: Runtime effects of evaluating the construct in a well-defined manner
94
+
*`panics`: Conditions under which evaluating the construct causes a runtime panic
95
+
*`preconditions`: Conditions which must be satisfied for the evaluation of the construct to be well-defined
96
+
*`namespace`: For items only, specifies the namespace(s) the item introduces a name in. May also be used elsewhere when defining a namespace (e.g. `r[attribute.diagnostic.namespace]`)
97
+
5. When a rule doesn't fall under the above keywords. or for section rule ids, name the subrule as follows:
98
+
* If the rule is naming a specific Rust language construct (IE. an attribute, standard library type/function, or keyword-introduced concept), use the construct as named in the language, appropriately case-adjusted (but do not replace `_`s with `-`s)
99
+
* Other than rust language concepts with `_`s in the name, use `-` characters to separate words within a "subrule"
100
+
* Whenever possible, do not repeat previous components of the rule
101
+
* Prefer using singular forms of words over plural unless the rule applies to a list or the construct is named as plural in the language (e.g. `r[attribute.diagnostic.lint.group])
102
+
* Whenever possible, don't use a name that conflicts with one of the above keywords, even if this violates the first bullet.
103
+
* Use an appropriately discriptive, but short, name if the language does not provide one.
104
+
6. When a keyword applies, but multiple different rules in the same section would use the same keyword, prefix or suffix the rule with a descriptive id given above, separated with a `-`
105
+
* When the paragraph modifies a specific named construct or applies to a specific named construct only, prefix the rule with the name of the construct (e.g. `r[items.fn.params.self-constraint]`).
106
+
* When the paragraph refers to a specific named construct that applies the particular keyword behaviour, suffix the rule with the name of the construct
107
+
78
108
### Standard library links
79
109
80
110
You should link to the standard library without specifying a URL in a fashion similar to [rustdoc intra-doc links][intra]. Some examples:
0 commit comments