Rollup merge of rust-lang#125451 - oli-obk:const_type_mismatch, r=compiler-errors

Fail relating constants of different types

fixes rust-lang#121585
fixes rust-lang#121858
fixes rust-lang#124151

I gave this several attempts before, but we lost too many important diagnostics until I managed to make compilation never bail out early. We have reached this point, so now we can finally fix all those ICEs by bubbling up an error instead of continueing when we encounter a bug.

Author: matthiaskrgr

compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/relate/combine.rs

@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ use super::glb::Glb;
 use super::lub::Lub;
 use super::type_relating::TypeRelating;
 use super::StructurallyRelateAliases;
-use crate::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, TypeTrace};
+use crate::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, InferOk, TypeTrace};
 use crate::traits::{Obligation, PredicateObligations};
 use rustc_middle::bug;
-use rustc_middle::infer::canonical::OriginalQueryValues;
 use rustc_middle::infer::unify_key::EffectVarValue;
+use rustc_middle::traits::ObligationCause;
 use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
 use rustc_middle::ty::relate::{RelateResult, TypeRelation};
 use rustc_middle::ty::{self, InferConst, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeVisitableExt, Upcast};
@@ -159,36 +159,11 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
         let a = self.shallow_resolve_const(a);
         let b = self.shallow_resolve_const(b);
 
-        // We should never have to relate the `ty` field on `Const` as it is checked elsewhere that consts have the
-        // correct type for the generic param they are an argument for. However there have been a number of cases
-        // historically where asserting that the types are equal has found bugs in the compiler so this is valuable
-        // to check even if it is a bit nasty impl wise :(
-        //
-        // This probe is probably not strictly necessary but it seems better to be safe and not accidentally find
-        // ourselves with a check to find bugs being required for code to compile because it made inference progress.
-        self.probe(|_| {
-            if a.ty() == b.ty() {
-                return;
-            }
-
-            // We don't have access to trait solving machinery in `rustc_infer` so the logic for determining if the
-            // two const param's types are able to be equal has to go through a canonical query with the actual logic
-            // in `rustc_trait_selection`.
-            let canonical = self.canonicalize_query(
-                relation.param_env().and((a.ty(), b.ty())),
-                &mut OriginalQueryValues::default(),
-            );
-            self.tcx.check_tys_might_be_eq(canonical).unwrap_or_else(|_| {
-                // The error will only be reported later. If we emit an ErrorGuaranteed
-                // here, then we will never get to the code that actually emits the error.
-                self.tcx.dcx().delayed_bug(format!(
-                    "cannot relate consts of different types (a={a:?}, b={b:?})",
-                ));
-                // We treat these constants as if they were of the same type, so that any
-                // such constants being used in impls make these impls match barring other mismatches.
-                // This helps with diagnostics down the road.
-            });
-        });
+        // It is always an error if the types of two constants that are related are not equal.
+        let InferOk { value: (), obligations } = self
+            .at(&ObligationCause::dummy_with_span(relation.span()), relation.param_env())
+            .eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, a.ty(), b.ty())?;
+        relation.register_obligations(obligations);
 
         match (a.kind(), b.kind()) {
             (

compiler/rustc_middle/src/query/mod.rs

@@ -2218,15 +2218,6 @@ rustc_queries! {
         separate_provide_extern
     }
 
-    /// Used in `super_combine_consts` to ICE if the type of the two consts are definitely not going to end up being
-    /// equal to eachother. This might return `Ok` even if the types are not equal, but will never return `Err` if
-    /// the types might be equal.
-    query check_tys_might_be_eq(
-        arg: Canonical<'tcx, ty::ParamEnvAnd<'tcx, (Ty<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>)>>
-    ) -> Result<(), NoSolution> {
-        desc { "check whether two const param are definitely not equal to eachother"}
-    }
-
     /// Get all item paths that were stripped by a `#[cfg]` in a particular crate.
     /// Should not be called for the local crate before the resolver outputs are created, as it
     /// is only fed there.

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/misc.rs

@@ -1,17 +1,14 @@
 //! Miscellaneous type-system utilities that are too small to deserve their own modules.
 
 use crate::regions::InferCtxtRegionExt;
-use crate::traits::{self, ObligationCause, ObligationCtxt};
+use crate::traits::{self, ObligationCause};
 
 use hir::LangItem;
 use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxIndexSet;
 use rustc_hir as hir;
-use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::Canonical;
 use rustc_infer::infer::{RegionResolutionError, TyCtxtInferExt};
-use rustc_infer::traits::query::NoSolution;
 use rustc_infer::{infer::outlives::env::OutlivesEnvironment, traits::FulfillmentError};
 use rustc_middle::ty::{self, AdtDef, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeVisitableExt};
-use rustc_span::DUMMY_SP;
 
 use super::outlives_bounds::InferCtxtExt;
 
@@ -207,19 +204,3 @@ pub fn all_fields_implement_trait<'tcx>(
 
     if infringing.is_empty() { Ok(()) } else { Err(infringing) }
 }
-
-pub fn check_tys_might_be_eq<'tcx>(
-    tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
-    canonical: Canonical<'tcx, ty::ParamEnvAnd<'tcx, (Ty<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>)>>,
-) -> Result<(), NoSolution> {
-    let (infcx, key, _) = tcx.infer_ctxt().build_with_canonical(DUMMY_SP, &canonical);
-    let (param_env, (ty_a, ty_b)) = key.into_parts();
-    let ocx = ObligationCtxt::new(&infcx);
-
-    let result = ocx.eq(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env, ty_a, ty_b);
-    // use `select_where_possible` instead of `select_all_or_error` so that
-    // we don't get errors from obligations being ambiguous.
-    let errors = ocx.select_where_possible();
-
-    if errors.len() > 0 || result.is_err() { Err(NoSolution) } else { Ok(()) }
-}

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/mod.rs

@@ -551,7 +551,6 @@ pub fn provide(providers: &mut Providers) {
         specialization_graph_of: specialize::specialization_graph_provider,
         specializes: specialize::specializes,
         instantiate_and_check_impossible_predicates,
-        check_tys_might_be_eq: misc::check_tys_might_be_eq,
         is_impossible_associated_item,
         ..*providers
     };

tests/crashes/119381.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+//! This test used to ICE (#119381), because relating the `u8` and `i8` generic
+//! const with the array length of the `Self` type was succeeding under the
+//! assumption that an error had already been reported.
+
+#![feature(with_negative_coherence)]
+trait Trait {}
+impl<const N: u8> Trait for [(); N] {}
+//~^ ERROR: mismatched types
+impl<const N: i8> Trait for [(); N] {}
+//~^ ERROR: mismatched types
+
+fn main() {}