Skip to content

Commit d5eeb09

Browse files
committed
Use more intuitive local var numbering
In test code we use multiple pub/sec keys. It is more intuitive if the 'secret 1' is generated by the owner of secret key 1. Refactor only, no logic changes.
1 parent 834f63c commit d5eeb09

File tree

1 file changed

+4
-4
lines changed

1 file changed

+4
-4
lines changed

src/ecdh.rs

Lines changed: 4 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ use secp256k1_sys::types::{c_int, c_uchar, c_void};
3434
/// let s = Secp256k1::new();
3535
/// let (sk1, pk1) = s.generate_keypair(&mut thread_rng());
3636
/// let (sk2, pk2) = s.generate_keypair(&mut thread_rng());
37-
/// let sec1 = SharedSecret::new(&pk1, &sk2);
38-
/// let sec2 = SharedSecret::new(&pk2, &sk1);
37+
/// let sec1 = SharedSecret::new(&pk2, &sk1);
38+
/// let sec2 = SharedSecret::new(&pk1, &sk2);
3939
/// assert_eq!(sec1, sec2);
4040
/// # }
4141
// ```
@@ -200,8 +200,8 @@ mod tests {
200200
let (sk1, pk1) = s.generate_keypair(&mut thread_rng());
201201
let (sk2, pk2) = s.generate_keypair(&mut thread_rng());
202202

203-
let sec1 = SharedSecret::new(&pk1, &sk2);
204-
let sec2 = SharedSecret::new(&pk2, &sk1);
203+
let sec1 = SharedSecret::new(&pk2, &sk1);
204+
let sec2 = SharedSecret::new(&pk1, &sk2);
205205
let sec_odd = SharedSecret::new(&pk1, &sk1);
206206
assert_eq!(sec1, sec2);
207207
assert!(sec_odd != sec2);

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)