#844 add a test for this problem. Confirm it succeeds with latest extract changes

grleachman · grleachman · commit 95031400f0f3 · 2016-06-14T20:10:15.000+01:00
diff --git a/RetailCoder.VBE/Refactorings/ExtractMethod/IExtractMethodRule.cs b/RetailCoder.VBE/Refactorings/ExtractMethod/IExtractMethodRule.cs
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-﻿using Rubberduck.Parsing.Symbols;
+﻿using System;
+using Rubberduck.Parsing.Symbols;
 using Rubberduck.VBEditor;
 
 namespace Rubberduck.Refactorings.ExtractMethod
diff --git a/RubberduckTests/Refactoring/ExtractMethod/ExtractMethodTests.cs b/RubberduckTests/Refactoring/ExtractMethod/ExtractMethodTests.cs
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
 using System.Diagnostics;
 using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
 using Rubberduck.Parsing.Symbols;
+using Rubberduck.Parsing.VBA;
 using Rubberduck.Refactorings.ExtractMethod;
+using Rubberduck.VBEditor;
 
 namespace RubberduckTests.Refactoring.ExtractMethod
 {

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@`
`2`	`2`	`using System.Diagnostics;`
`3`	`3`	`using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;`
`4`	`4`	`using Rubberduck.Parsing.Symbols;`
	`5`	`+using Rubberduck.Parsing.VBA;`
`5`	`6`	`using Rubberduck.Refactorings.ExtractMethod;`
	`7`	`+using Rubberduck.VBEditor;`
`6`	`8`
`7`	`9`	`namespace RubberduckTests.Refactoring.ExtractMethod`
`8`	`10`	`{`