Incorrect use of "hasresethaltreq" in section 4.6 #1144
Description
When looking at #1142, I noticed that the use of "hasresethaltreq" is completely wrong in section 4.6 (https://github.com/riscv/riscv-debug-spec/blob/main/Sdext.adoc?plain=1#L171). It should refer to the actual resethaltreq bit rather than the field that says whether the resethaltreq bit exists.
The LaTeX was correct: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-debug-spec/blob/latex/Sdext.tex#L166 and it was broken by a manual edit during the adoc conversion process: 302f880#diff-2875d33a4b0e40137132883c0f9990619f83d859df46e1f650dee12d2bac5f40L166
If anybody did what's written in the adoc spec then the fact that the DM simply supports resethaltreq would mean that every reset would halt regardless of the state of resethaltreq. That doesn't make sense.