Some thoughts on covidHubUtils development #186
Replies: 5 comments 1 reply
-
r.e. file paths in the functions get_truth.R -- I agree that using the here package is useful, but I think that use of here belongs in the script calling those functions rather than in the functions themselves |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Re: documentation- we added issues #192 #193 #194 #195 to improve documentation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
r.e.: "maybe add functionality for adjustments, i.e. don't give negative cases?" For now, we've decided adjusting truth data is out of scope. There is some functionality related to this in the covidData package, and we're working towards adding support for European hub truth data there. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Issue #198 created to have a designated place to iterate on re-design of load_forecasts. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We would happily accept a PR to create simple ensembles. given our existing functionality in covidEnsembles, we are not going to prioritize this development. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
file paths
documentation
Function arguments
Zoltar connections
load truth
load forecasts
additional features that would be nice
Thoughts I had earlier that may be outdated and other functions I haven't looked at in detail yet
plot_forecast.R
get_plot_forecast_data.R
get_all_models.R
get_hub_locations.R
get_model_designations.R
get_truth.R
date_management.R
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions