Inconsistant result in -f and -g -f commands

[nameless0704]

Describe the bug
Different parsing results when processing same input file.

SQL
After activating the virtualenv, run
sqllineage -f filename.sql
sqllineage -g -f filename.sql
getting two different results.

To Reproduce

• if CLI (Command Line Interface): provide the command you're calling and the output.
  For example:

sqllineage -f filename.sql

Statements(#): 1
Source Tables:
    <default>.c_pb_exch_rate_info
    <default>.c_pb_std_inter_org
    <default>.c_pt_corp_cust_fin_index
    <default>.m_1io_inter_org
    <default>.m_1io_prtcptr_bank_no_info
    <default>.m_1pt_ccms_cust_basic_info_tab
    <default>.m_1pt_ccms_cust_rat_role_info
    <default>.m_1pt_ccms_incls_fin_label_info
    <default>.m_1pt_core_cust_grp_basic_info
    <default>.m_1pt_corp_partic
    <default>.m_1pt_corp_partic_catgr_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_corp_partic_cotx_info_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_corp_partic_expand_info
    <default>.m_1pt_corp_partic_inslt_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_corp_partic_oper_info
    <default>.m_1pt_corp_partic_oper_survey_info
    <default>.m_1pt_corp_partic_org_catgr_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_corp_partic_other_info
    <default>.m_1pt_corp_partic_qlf_info_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_corp_partic_reg_info
    <default>.m_1pt_fin_org_cust_expand_info
    <default>.m_1pt_fin_org_cust_org_expand_info
    <default>.m_1pt_inter_rat_reslt
    <default>.m_1pt_partic
    <default>.m_1pt_partic_aml_idtfy_info_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_partic_corp_annuity_info_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_partic_doc_info_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_partic_fix_tel_addr_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_partic_imp_label_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_partic_mobile_tel_addr_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_partic_name_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_partic_phys_addr_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_partic_rela_hst
    <default>.m_1pt_partic_syn_statmt_info_hst
    <default>.m_2pd_core_dpsit_prod
    <default>.m_3ag_clrhs_bil_info
    <default>.m_3ag_cntrc_limi_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_cntrc_limi_prod_subopt_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_cntrct_imp_dt_hst
    <default>.m_3ag_cntrct_relat_pty_info_hst
    <default>.m_3ag_cust_total_cnt_subopt
    <default>.m_3ag_dom_lc_buyer_estb_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_dom_lc_buyer_fin_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_dom_lc_buyer_income_bil_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_dom_lc_seller_fin_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_dpsit_accnt
    <default>.m_3ag_exp_col_fin_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_exp_dbl_fact_invoice_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_exp_lc_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_exp_lc_fin_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_fft_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_flexi_fin_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_guar_letter_estb_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_imp_agcol_fin_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_imp_exp_reim_refn_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_imp_lc_arr_of_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_imp_lc_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_imp_lc_fin_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_imp_pick_goods_guar_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_lnacct
    <default>.m_3ag_obank_elec_acpt_bil_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_obank_paper_acptbil_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_order_fin_fin_cntrct
    <default>.m_3ag_pool_fin_crdt_line_deg_sub_cont
    <default>.m_5ev_fact_busi_pst_fin_event
    <default>.m_9rf_quot_para_tab
    <default>.m_pb_pub_cd
    <default>.m_pb_pub_cd_map
    <default>.t_md_cbs_para_trans
Target Tables:
    <default>.c_pt_corp_cust

• elif Web UI (Web User Interface): provide the lineage graph which could be downloaded from the page, or screenshots if there're components other than the lineage graph that's related to this bug.
  

Expected behavior
Getting same results in different format but same tables parsed

Python version (available via python --version)

• 3.10.11

SQLLineage version (available via sqllineage --version):

• 1.5.3

[reata]

Please share the sql as well to help us reproduce.