Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
There's only a handful of breaking changes with Tailwind 4, so it won't be too bad to add in at a glance, the main issue being avoiding duplication/clashing, or breaking things entirely (e.g. needing to support both import approaches) There's a handful of bug fixes, and some minor changes to do, along with some further rationalisation/standardisation, which will make it smoother to add in. I'm hoping to look in the next week or so at precisely how much work it is going to be, at which point I'll be able to give a guestimate at a release date. The nice shiny utility elements of tw4 however are likely to come down the line a bit further. Given that we will have to add in an isTailwind4 etc, it will add in some performance overhead, which is something that I'll need to think about, especially for a td cell for example. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Before I embark on adding in all of TW4, it'd be good to understand the level of demand for it, if anyone is eagerly awaiting this, please do give a thumbs up or similar on this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Given there's 9 upvotes, and 2.1m installs in total, while I fully plan to add it in, the first logical step to my mind will be adding in a toggle for TW4 which will default to TW3 classes at present, which will allow other contributors to fix the class order etc. There's a pretty sizeable update coming for the package, so I need to figure if I can include this or not. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@lrljoe any update? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
"When will it be compatible with Tailwind 4? I'm looking forward to using it, and I'd like to know if there's an estimated release or any updates on this compatibility."
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions