Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
@rzw so you're concluding the .exe build is rather unusual and most likely not widely used? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Regarding windows there are three options to run the program
All files are more or less the same size which obviously(?) means that the standalone sleek-1.3.1-win.exe unpacks in volatile memory/RAM, which is why it takes longer to start up the application. Of course there are many applications with standalone exe's. But I haven't seen this as an option besides setup and archive. So I thought I'd mention it here.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions