Skip to content

How should I deal with deprecated ACF field types #1351

Answered by herrvigg
hirasso asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

This come from the changes I made in pull request #1305.

Since the standard ACF fields are better supported, those should be preferred over the qTranslate extended fields.
In particular: text, textarea, wysiwyg are covered by the ACF standard fields, while others only exist as qTranslate extended fields.

The standard fields should give a better support on the long run.
We should only use specific QTX custom fields when it's strictly necessary.
Does it answer your question?

Replies: 2 comments 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@hirasso
Comment options

Answer selected by hirasso
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants