PEP 772: Updates based on conversations at PyCon (#4429)

* Updates based on conversations at PyCon

* Align PPC Electors with PSF voting members as described in the PSF bylaws.  Rather than the previous
  categories, this approach is generally deemed to be both equitable and workable.
* Update the mechanics and timeline of PPC elections, into three phases: self-selection of Electors,
  nominations of Council members, voting
* Remove the language around initial membership and adding a new member, as these are no longer necessary.
* Add language about the call for deanonymization of ballots in cases where foul play is suspected.
* Clarify the PSC's role in approving changes to this PEP, and responsibilities in certain corner cases of the
  election process.
* Explicitly disallow PSC members from concurrently serving on the PPC.
* Clarify language around the expectation of the PSC and PSF to adjust existing standing delegations
* Unify language around "Packaging Council Electors" rather than "voting members"
* Added an acknowledgments section
* Various spelling, grammar, and wording fixes

* Fix duplicate anchor

* Update peps/pep-0772.rst

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update peps/pep-0772.rst

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update peps/pep-0772.rst

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update peps/pep-0772.rst

Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@ldpreload.com>

* Update peps/pep-0772.rst

Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@ldpreload.com>

* Update peps/pep-0772.rst

Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@ldpreload.com>

* Update peps/pep-0772.rst

Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@ldpreload.com>

* Update peps/pep-0772.rst

Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>

* Update peps/pep-0772.rst

Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>

* Many updates based on GH review

* Use @geofft's rephrasing suggestion for conflict of interest

* Since the SC calls votes of no confidence, we don't need an explicit rate limit

* Describe eligibility based on contributing membership a little more elegantly.

* Elections should be transparent and maintain anonymity

* Describe quorum for the entire election

Also, add the word "Council" to the PEP title for better search results.

* "Removal of a member" section is no longer applicable

#4429 (comment)

* We unify "quorum" elsewhere

* Updates based on the latest round of comments

* Slight wording changes in Phase 1 regarding ballot requests
* Elaborate in Phase 3 about receiving a ballot
* Small wording change around full-Council elections

* Update Appendix A for PSF Board approval process

---------

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@ldpreload.com>
Co-authored-by: Carol Willing <carolcode@willingconsulting.com>

Author: 4 people