Skip to content

Commit 8ee34a4

Browse files
committed
python packages section
1 parent 713b2b8 commit 8ee34a4

File tree

1 file changed

+10
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+10
-0
lines changed

_posts/2024-05-28-pyos-newsletter-june-2024.md

Lines changed: 10 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -24,8 +24,18 @@ comments: true
2424

2525

2626
## <i class="fa-solid fa-hand-holding-heart"></i> Python packages for everyone!
27+
pyOpenSci's [Open Peer Review process](https://www.pyopensci.org/about-peer-review/index.html) is experiencing an [unprecedented number of Python package submissions](https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues! We're excited to see so many wonderful packages that are helping scientists help make the world a better place being submitted for review. Our open peer review process facilitates scientists getting credit and recognition for the work they’ve invested in developing scientific Python tools. The peer review process also supports scientists in finding vetted and maintained software, which drives their open science workflows.
2728

29+
You can submit your package for review (or pre-submission inquiry to determine if it's in scope) by [submitting an issue](https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues/new/choose) to [our software-submission repository](https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission). And because all of our reviews are open, [you can see our review process in action](https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission).
2830

31+
We're also accepting applications for [package reviewers](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeVf-L_1-jYeO84OvEE8UemEoCmIiD5ddP_aO8S90vb7srADQ/viewform). We welcome reviewers from a diversity of background and with varying levels of Python technical expertise.
32+
33+
Some of the basic things that we look for in a review include:
34+
* Familiarity with using the Python programming language.
35+
* Ability to evaluate a Python package for usability and documentation quality.
36+
* Ability to provide a technical review of Python package structure and code quality / approach to solving the problems that the package seeks to address.
37+
38+
We like to have a mix of technical and usability focus in our reviews so it’s ok if you don’t have all of the above skills!
2939

3040
## <i class="fa-solid fa-bullhorn"></i> Get involved with pyOpenSci: call for editors
3141
<figure>

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)