Should we have set_pixel() ?

[villares]

I know now we have advanced NumPy arrays of pixels and all, but the get() function looks a bit lonely now....

http://py5coding.org/reference/sketch_get.html?highlight=get

I know it is highly inefficient comparing to access to pixels[] and np_pixels[] but maybe it should be the "entry level" way of doing old set() as set_pixel().

Maybe get() should be called get_pixel()?

[hx2A]

py5 has no set() method because it would conflict with the Python builtin but there is a get() method...I agree, it would have been a better decision to rename set() to set_pixel() and then also rename get() to the analogous get_pixel(). That's a better API design than providing a get() without a set(). This is an easy change to make. Will open an issue for this now.