Thoughts about docker possh (Push Over SSH) instead of pussh?

[luislavena]

Hello!

I saw a few folks commenting that pussh could be seen in some docs or usage as a typo and people aiming to correct it, so was wondering what about possh instead?

Push Over SSH

But not sure if you want unregistry be associated with british "posh" and luxurious references 😆

Anyhow, thank you for releasing unregistry! It has been a time savior to avoid the docker save/load piping dance I had to do in the past! 👏

Thank you!
❤️ ❤️ ❤️

[psviderski]

Haha love the "posh" reference! Thank you for your kind words! I'm so happy when our tools make other people's lives better ❤️
There is a bit more to it, for example, there is a PR that adds support for pull over ssh: #34

It seems pussh and possh still work for both of the cases:

• PUsh/PUll over SSH - pussh
• Push/Pull Over SSH - possh

I don't know if we should be too opinionated about that. The reality is that you can very easily call it however you want, just rename the script:

mv ~/.docker/cli-plugins/docker-pussh ~/.docker/cli-plugins/docker-possh

now the command is called docker possh. Yeah, the --help output will still use pussh in the examples but I don't think it's a big deal.

Maybe we need to add a section in the README clarifying that anyone can call the command however they want by just renaming the script.