Replies: 4 comments
-
If this was done, we could change the Dockerfile (or add a new Dockerfile) that runs it in that same headless mode:
The variable $SHEADLESS could default to the empty string. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think it is simpler to have a 1 line change, server.launch(open_browser=True) instead of the additional conditional to check the sysarg. Fewer boilerplate lines, and also the argument can be toggled quickly if the model needs to be run on a Docker container. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Changed it accordingly. Thanks for the comments. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Merged in, so I'm closing this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Would it be too much to ask model creators to change their run.py files to take an optional argument using something like sys.argv[], perhaps labelled headless. So that to run the server in a headless mode, one could run
mesa runserver --headlesss project
Then main.py in the mesa project could be modified to look for the
--headless
option and include it:In turn, run,.py would look for that argument. If the option was present, they could use server.launch() with the open_browser parameter set to false.
server.launch(open_browser = False)
Here is an example: https://github.com/projectmesa/mesa-examples/pull/29/files . If this seems acceptable, an issue could be raised to modify the examples in mesa-examples in a similar fashion and to update documentation in repo mesa accordingly.
This change would allow people to more easily run a model inside a docker container. Or it would be a lighter way of running a long model if you didn't care about seeing the output until the work is done.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions