Skip to content

Commit 1daf47e

Browse files
committed
Update bloom.sgml
1 parent 3b2af2e commit 1daf47e

File tree

1 file changed

+34
-34
lines changed

1 file changed

+34
-34
lines changed

postgresql/doc/src/sgml/bloom.sgml

Lines changed: 34 additions & 34 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -210,11 +210,11 @@ SELECT 10000000
210210
=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tbloom WHERE i2 = 898732 AND i5 = 123451;
211211
QUERY PLAN
212212
-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-&zwsp;-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-−-
213-
Seq Scan on tbloom (cost=0.00..2137.14 rows=3 width=24) (actual time=15.480..15.480 rows=0 loops=1)
213+
Seq Scan on tbloom (cost=0.00..2137.14 rows=3 width=24) (actual time=16.971..16.971 rows=0 loops=1)
214214
Filter: ((i2 = 898732) AND (i5 = 123451))
215215
Rows Removed by Filter: 100000
216-
Planning Time: 0.340 ms
217-
Execution Time: 15.501 ms
216+
Planning Time: 0.346 ms
217+
Execution Time: 16.988 ms
218218
(5 rows)
219219
</programlisting>
220220
</para>
@@ -225,11 +225,11 @@ ____________________________________________________________________________-->
225225
=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tbloom WHERE i2 = 898732 AND i5 = 123451;
226226
QUERY PLAN
227227
-------------------------------------------------------------------&zwsp;-----------------------------------
228-
Seq Scan on tbloom (cost=0.00..2137.14 rows=3 width=24) (actual time=15.480..15.480 rows=0 loops=1)
228+
Seq Scan on tbloom (cost=0.00..2137.14 rows=3 width=24) (actual time=16.971..16.971 rows=0 loops=1)
229229
Filter: ((i2 = 898732) AND (i5 = 123451))
230230
Rows Removed by Filter: 100000
231-
Planning Time: 0.340 ms
232-
Execution Time: 15.501 ms
231+
Planning Time: 0.346 ms
232+
Execution Time: 16.988 ms
233233
(5 rows)
234234
</programlisting>
235235
</para>
@@ -249,11 +249,11 @@ CREATE INDEX
249249
=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tbloom WHERE i2 = 898732 AND i5 = 123451;
250250
QUERY PLAN
251251
-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&zwsp;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-
252-
Seq Scan on tbloom (cost=0.00..2137.00 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=12.604..12.604 rows=0 loops=1)
252+
Seq Scan on tbloom (cost=0.00..2137.00 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=12.805..12.805 rows=0 loops=1)
253253
Filter: ((i2 = 898732) AND (i5 = 123451))
254254
Rows Removed by Filter: 100000
255-
Planning Time: 0.155 ms
256-
Execution Time: 12.617 ms
255+
Planning Time: 0.138 ms
256+
Execution Time: 12.817 ms
257257
(5 rows)
258258
</programlisting>
259259
</para>
@@ -271,11 +271,11 @@ CREATE INDEX
271271
=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tbloom WHERE i2 = 898732 AND i5 = 123451;
272272
QUERY PLAN
273273
-------------------------------------------------------------------&zwsp;-----------------------------------
274-
Seq Scan on tbloom (cost=0.00..2137.00 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=12.604..12.604 rows=0 loops=1)
274+
Seq Scan on tbloom (cost=0.00..2137.00 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=12.805..12.805 rows=0 loops=1)
275275
Filter: ((i2 = 898732) AND (i5 = 123451))
276276
Rows Removed by Filter: 100000
277-
Planning Time: 0.155 ms
278-
Execution Time: 12.617 ms
277+
Planning Time: 0.138 ms
278+
Execution Time: 12.817 ms
279279
(5 rows)
280280
</programlisting>
281281
</para>
@@ -295,14 +295,14 @@ CREATE INDEX
295295
=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tbloom WHERE i2 = 898732 AND i5 = 123451;
296296
QUERY PLAN
297297
-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&zwsp;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;
298-
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbloom (cost=1792.00..1799.69 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=0.384..0.384 rows=0 loops=1)
298+
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbloom (cost=1792.00..1799.69 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=0.388..0.388 rows=0 loops=1)
299299
Recheck Cond: ((i2 = 898732) AND (i5 = 123451))
300-
Rows Removed by Index Recheck: 26
301-
Heap Blocks: exact=26
302-
-&gt; Bitmap Index Scan on bloomidx (cost=0.00..1792.00 rows=2 width=0) (actual time=0.350..0.350 rows=26 loops=1)
300+
Rows Removed by Index Recheck: 29
301+
Heap Blocks: exact=28
302+
-&gt; Bitmap Index Scan on bloomidx (cost=0.00..1792.00 rows=2 width=0) (actual time=0.356..0.356 rows=29 loops=1)
303303
Index Cond: ((i2 = 898732) AND (i5 = 123451))
304-
Planning Time: 0.122 ms
305-
Execution Time: 0.407 ms
304+
Planning Time: 0.099 ms
305+
Execution Time: 0.408 ms
306306
(8 rows)
307307
</programlisting>
308308
</para>
@@ -320,14 +320,14 @@ CREATE INDEX
320320
=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tbloom WHERE i2 = 898732 AND i5 = 123451;
321321
QUERY PLAN
322322
-------------------------------------------------------------------&zwsp;--------------------------------------------------
323-
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbloom (cost=1792.00..1799.69 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=0.384..0.384 rows=0 loops=1)
323+
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbloom (cost=1792.00..1799.69 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=0.388..0.388 rows=0 loops=1)
324324
Recheck Cond: ((i2 = 898732) AND (i5 = 123451))
325-
Rows Removed by Index Recheck: 26
326-
Heap Blocks: exact=26
327-
-&gt; Bitmap Index Scan on bloomidx (cost=0.00..1792.00 rows=2 width=0) (actual time=0.350..0.350 rows=26 loops=1)
325+
Rows Removed by Index Recheck: 29
326+
Heap Blocks: exact=28
327+
-&gt; Bitmap Index Scan on bloomidx (cost=0.00..1792.00 rows=2 width=0) (actual time=0.356..0.356 rows=29 loops=1)
328328
Index Cond: ((i2 = 898732) AND (i5 = 123451))
329-
Planning Time: 0.122 ms
330-
Execution Time: 0.407 ms
329+
Planning Time: 0.099 ms
330+
Execution Time: 0.408 ms
331331
(8 rows)
332332
</programlisting>
333333
</para>
@@ -354,15 +354,15 @@ CREATE INDEX
354354
=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tbloom WHERE i2 = 898732 AND i5 = 123451;
355355
QUERY PLAN
356356
-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&zwsp;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;-&minus;
357-
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbloom (cost=24.34..32.03 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=0.032..0.033 rows=0 loops=1)
357+
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbloom (cost=24.34..32.03 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=0.028..0.029 rows=0 loops=1)
358358
Recheck Cond: ((i5 = 123451) AND (i2 = 898732))
359-
-&gt; BitmapAnd (cost=24.34..24.34 rows=2 width=0) (actual time=0.029..0.030 rows=0 loops=1)
360-
-&gt; Bitmap Index Scan on btreeidx5 (cost=0.00..12.04 rows=500 width=0) (actual time=0.029..0.029 rows=0 loops=1)
359+
-&gt; BitmapAnd (cost=24.34..24.34 rows=2 width=0) (actual time=0.027..0.027 rows=0 loops=1)
360+
-&gt; Bitmap Index Scan on btreeidx5 (cost=0.00..12.04 rows=500 width=0) (actual time=0.026..0.026 rows=0 loops=1)
361361
Index Cond: (i5 = 123451)
362362
-&gt; Bitmap Index Scan on btreeidx2 (cost=0.00..12.04 rows=500 width=0) (never executed)
363363
Index Cond: (i2 = 898732)
364-
Planning Time: 0.537 ms
365-
Execution Time: 0.064 ms
364+
Planning Time: 0.491 ms
365+
Execution Time: 0.055 ms
366366
(9 rows)
367367
</programlisting>
368368
Although this query runs much faster than with either of the single
@@ -389,15 +389,15 @@ CREATE INDEX
389389
=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tbloom WHERE i2 = 898732 AND i5 = 123451;
390390
QUERY PLAN
391391
-------------------------------------------------------------------&zwsp;--------------------------------------------------------
392-
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbloom (cost=24.34..32.03 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=0.032..0.033 rows=0 loops=1)
392+
Bitmap Heap Scan on tbloom (cost=24.34..32.03 rows=2 width=24) (actual time=0.028..0.029 rows=0 loops=1)
393393
Recheck Cond: ((i5 = 123451) AND (i2 = 898732))
394-
-&gt; BitmapAnd (cost=24.34..24.34 rows=2 width=0) (actual time=0.029..0.030 rows=0 loops=1)
395-
-&gt; Bitmap Index Scan on btreeidx5 (cost=0.00..12.04 rows=500 width=0) (actual time=0.029..0.029 rows=0 loops=1)
394+
-&gt; BitmapAnd (cost=24.34..24.34 rows=2 width=0) (actual time=0.027..0.027 rows=0 loops=1)
395+
-&gt; Bitmap Index Scan on btreeidx5 (cost=0.00..12.04 rows=500 width=0) (actual time=0.026..0.026 rows=0 loops=1)
396396
Index Cond: (i5 = 123451)
397397
-&gt; Bitmap Index Scan on btreeidx2 (cost=0.00..12.04 rows=500 width=0) (never executed)
398398
Index Cond: (i2 = 898732)
399-
Planning Time: 0.537 ms
400-
Execution Time: 0.064 ms
399+
Planning Time: 0.491 ms
400+
Execution Time: 0.055 ms
401401
(9 rows)
402402
</programlisting>
403403
尽管这个查询运行起来比在其中任一单个索引上都快,但是我们在索引尺寸上付出了代价。

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)