will this project keep going?

[rsyai-oos]

I've found this project have not updating for years, so will this project keep going?

[LowLevelSubmarine]

I've just discovered this crate and was wondering about that too

[LowLevelSubmarine]

There is a really simple PR #39 that is now open for a year, so i guess the answer is sadly no :/

[pedrocr]

The project is not abandoned, I just haven't had much time to work on it and it already does everything I need. I guess I should do a release with more camera support if there's interest.

[LowLevelSubmarine]

That would be really nice. My first impression was that this library would need a lot of maintanance but i guess i was wrong. Thank you for your work!

[anshap1719]

@pedrocr

I'm working on some changes where the camera support configuration is generated based on the data available here: https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed/blob/develop/data/cameras.xml.

This happens at compile time using build scripts, and it allows the library to keep up to date with the camera models that use the same format/decoder config but have a different model.

I am planning to release the project as a separate crate because I'm using it in a lot of places and there are so many cameras that are technically supported but the library fails because no config file exists for them. If this is something that you're interested in, I'd love to rather focus on getting it merged to this project itself.

[pedrocr]

I'm happy to take PRs. Sourcing config files from rawspeed is probably fine. And having a script in a tools dir to do it sounds great. I have a set of scripts to create configs from example files from pixls.us and to check them. I should probably put those with instructions in a tools dir as well.