JOSENotSupported: Extension Header Parameter "sigT" is not recognized #578
-
| Hi, I'm trying to create a PoC EBSI (EU framework) valid document, and the last piece that's missing is adding the  While at this time my timestamp is not a qualified one, this page https://ec.europa.eu/digital-building-blocks/DSS/webapp-demo/validation returns on error on the absence of  
 Here is my current header: So I'm assuming this is because I don't have the  I get the following error: The spec (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7515#section-4.1.11) does not seem to exclude any word other than the reserved ones, and  | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
| The sign method options argument has a crit option which makes the header "recognized". | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
The sign method options argument has a crit option which makes the header "recognized".