Reqnroll
What about SpecFlow.SharedSteps in ReqNRoll? #460
-
|
Hi all, In our project , we used to work with SpecFlow.SharedSteps to be able to factorise common steps used in several project. Thanks a lot for your answer |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 6 replies
-
|
It's MIT licensed, you should be able to fork it and adapt it. And if there is no existing Nuget, you could create one. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
that's what we did, took the code and adapted it to make it work well |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's not a library I'm familiar with: what does it _do?_
…On Fri, 14 Feb 2025, 15:17 Albert Weinert, ***@***.***> wrote:
It's MIT licensed, you should be able to fork it and adapt it. And if
there is no existing Nuget, you could create one.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#460 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAY5LSQ43SLDL4DCQGEOJ5L2PYCG7AVCNFSM6AAAAABXEDXYQ2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTEMRQGIYTKMA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It provides a set of pre-built StepBindings that take a Feature name and Scenario name as input; dynamically builds a Castle proxy to the binding class containing that targeted Feature and invokes the Scenario method on it. Porting to Reqnroll might be possible but with likely significant hurdles. I'm scratching my head even to understand how this worked successfully 5 years ago when it was last updated. It makes a lot of assumptions about the internals of the test runner and how the feature class code gets generated. And doesn't (at least on a cursory read) provide any mechanism for ensuring that the set-up/teardown of the shared Feature class get invoked. It seems to simply jump directly to invoking the scenario method. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm not sure I understand the problem it's trying to solve. I'd like to be able to suggest possible alternatives. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
was just asking if somewhere there was a migration of this nuget as all other Specflow.XX nuget has been migrated to ReqNRoll.XX ;) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
No. That package was created by a private individual, not the SpecFlow team. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
oh! Ok . Thanks for your answer :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
It's MIT licensed, you should be able to fork it and adapt it. And if there is no existing Nuget, you could create one.