Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes, this question is very good. Since keywords such as |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Basically I want to check the values assigned to attributes of an index signature schema:
...since there are no means to reference the value of the index signature, I think there is a conceptual or syntactical problem/gap. IMHO and from the fact, that there can only be one or no index signature defined, I would rather skip the customizable naming feature and would use some sort of keyword/builtin e.g. "signature" to expose key and value of the attribute e.g.
signature.key
andsignature.value
wheresignature
itself might beUndefined
in case the index signature of the schema is not defined.@Peefy Honestly, by the way the syntax is defined, there is not much room for a named reference to the signature value - so introducing a keyword or a new syntax e.g.
<name:type>
ortype as name
seems to be an escape...Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions