Comments on the new landing page

[marcobonici]

Hi @gcanasherrera ,
I gave a deeper look. I really like what you did, thanks!
I did not spot any typo.

I have a couple of generic comments, but they should be addressed afterwards, as we have unit tests and other stuff.

1. Citation. I would have a stronger statement, something like "free usage of the software in this repository is provided, given that you cite our release paper/Zenodo bib" (the latter could easily be done soonish, the paper will take some time.
2. Contribution. I would suggest to people to discuss with the mantainers what they will implement and how. This is important as it is possible that we can foresee a problem with a suggested implementation before it is actually implemented (saving everyone's time!) or because we are working on something that will change the internals. This is something that is often done in the Open Source Software community (see here for an example from Julia people).
3. Papers using our software. I would encourage the users that publish a paper using cloelib to let us know and, if they are ok, list their paper on a dedicated page of "papers using cloelib". This is something that is often done in OSS (here they did that citing my work, as I was using their library, and it felt very good to me).

I think it is premature to implement these things I just listed now. If everyone agree, I will implement them later (once we have a zenodo link to our software after release, a paper etc.

[itutusaus]

Hi Everyone, thanks for the landing page, it looks great! I just wanted to say that I tested the hyperlinks and I think the darkflipper one points to playground. The link pointing to all repositories is the same landing page, right? Do we want to keep it? And I think the link pointing to Discussions (in How to Get Involved) might be broken?

[marcobonici]

Hi @itutusaus thanks for the comments!
I have fixed the darkflipper and the Discussions links!
I also updated the link pointing to our repositories.
We are asking Sam to review it, but we should be mostly done.

[gcanasherrera]

What about including logos of funding institutions (employers)? @cloe-org/cloe-maintainers