New formula for wasmtime-c-api or extend existing wasmtime formula? #2248
Unanswered
eviltwin
asked this question in
Writing Formulae/Casks
Replies: 1 comment
-
If it's akin to Python bindings for a C library, then it should be part of the same formula and not a separate one. Feel free to open a PR to extend the existing |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm looking at doing some development using wasmtime's c api. It's part of the same git repository as the main wasmtime package but is built and installed with a separate command as shown in their docs.
So my question is should I be creating a new formula and submitting that for review or should I extend the existing wasmtime package in some way?
(note that the C API is a completely optional part of wasmtime and, since wasmtime is written in rust, is more akin to something like python bindings for a c library...)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions