Issue with PaXEvaluate in GG→HH Calculation and Wilson Coefficient Extraction #327
Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi, first of all, can you please post code that one can directly copy into a notebook to reproduce the calculation. Screenshots are not good for that and no one really has time to retype everything by hand. PaXEvaluate uses Package-X which is not being developed/supported since several years. And it never was open-source. So one should always expect issues popping up unexpectedly. But to say something definite I need to reproduce the error fist. Vanishing Gram determinants shouldn't be an issue, though. Direct evaluation of the scalar functions usually works without problems.
Ideally, you should enforce all kinematic constraints before the evaluation. It helps to simplify the calculation and make the output more manageable.
There's nothing really built-in for that, I think that everyone just writes they own custom code using the existing functions which does the job. There are a lot of packages that specialize on calculating Wilson coefficients from the matching and offer all kinds of automation, so I'd look into that direction if you need to do the matching for multiple models. Cheers, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear FeynCalc Developers/Community,
I’ve been working on a calculation involving gluon-gluon to Higgs-Higgs (GG→HH) scattering, inspired by the existing H→GG example in the FeynCalc documentation. After modifying the example, I successfully generated the Feynman diagrams and proceeded to express the amplitude in terms of Passarino-Veltman (PV) functions. However, when I attempted to evaluate these PV functions using PaXEvaluate from the FeynHelpers package, the output returned as "Undefined" without further explanation.





Specific Questions:
PaXEvaluate Issue:
Are there known limitations or specific kinematic conditions under which PaXEvaluate fails (e.g., vanishing Gram determinants, unregulated divergences)?
Should I enforce additional assumptions (e.g., on-shell conditions, dimensional regularization) before evaluation?
Wilson Coefficients:
If I aim to extract the Wilson coefficients from this Lagrangian, what would be the recommended workflow? For instance, is there a built-in FeynCalc utility to match the amplitude to an effective operator basis, or should I proceed manually by comparing tensor structures?
I’d greatly appreciate any insights into resolving the "Undefined" behavior or suggestions for extracting Wilson coefficients efficiently. Thank you for your time and support!
Best regards,
Pengfei
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions