Resilience dependencies for ORAS #73
Closed
sajayantony
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
Sounds a good idea. According to the official .NET doc, new libraries should target |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Closed by #75 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Enabling a good foundation, as this library matures and as we add more resilience capabilities to this like #49, would be critical to the long term usage.
With that in mind and having had some discussions internally with folks like @kichalla and @nathana1, I would like to propose we align with dotnet 8.0 which is LTS and has good alignment with Polly.
The main advantages I see are that we consider things like retries and resiliency from the get-go before we create an auth model. This also enables investing in testing as well.
The downsides, which all choices usually have, are that we have a larger dependency footprint. However, the fact remains that we create a library that can someday be used in serious application and not just for a sample or demo.
Thoughts? @shizhMSFT @Wwwsylvia
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions