Skip to content

Commit 3d037cf

Browse files
author
Nicolas Laurent
committed
fix javadoc import
1 parent 7ab53be commit 3d037cf

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-2
lines changed

src/main/java/org/truffleruby/language/dispatch/InternalRespondToNode.java

Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
1111

1212
import com.oracle.truffle.api.frame.VirtualFrame;
1313
import com.oracle.truffle.api.nodes.NodeCost;
14+
import org.truffleruby.core.kernel.KernelNodes.RespondToNode;
1415
import org.truffleruby.core.klass.RubyClass;
1516
import org.truffleruby.language.RubyBaseNode;
1617
import org.truffleruby.language.methods.InternalMethod;
@@ -24,8 +25,8 @@
2425
*
2526
* <p>
2627
* This does NOT call <code>respond_to_missing?</code> on the object, and as such is not a substitute for
27-
* {@link KernelNodes.RespondToNode} which implements the Ruby <code>Object#respond_to?</code>, and should be used in
28-
* almost all cases, especially when implementing Ruby methods with Java nodes. */
28+
* {@link RespondToNode} which implements the Ruby <code>Object#respond_to?</code>, and should be used in almost all
29+
* cases, especially when implementing Ruby methods with Java nodes. */
2930
public class InternalRespondToNode extends RubyBaseNode {
3031

3132
// NOTE(norswap): cf. comment above static fields in DispatchNode to see why we need this field

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)