Skip to content

Commit 4f4dbca

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #73013 from rh-tokeefe/OSSM-6086
OSSM-6086: Formatting issue in federation gateway parameters table
2 parents eeb7614 + 5377c4a commit 4f4dbca

File tree

1 file changed

+11
-11
lines changed

1 file changed

+11
-11
lines changed

modules/ossm-federation-config-smcp.adoc

Lines changed: 11 additions & 11 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -200,15 +200,15 @@ To avoid naming conflicts between meshes, you must create separate egress and in
200200
|spec:
201201
gateways:
202202
additionalEgress:
203-
<egressName>:
203+
<egress_name>:
204204
|Define an additional egress gateway for _each_ mesh peer in the federation.
205205
|
206206
|
207207

208208
|spec:
209209
gateways:
210210
additionalEgress:
211-
<egressName>:
211+
<egress_name>:
212212
enabled:
213213
|This parameter enables or disables the federation egress.
214214
|`true`/`false`
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ To avoid naming conflicts between meshes, you must create separate egress and in
217217
|spec:
218218
gateways:
219219
additionalEgress:
220-
<egressName>:
220+
<egress_name>:
221221
requestedNetworkView:
222222
|Networks associated with exported services.
223223
|Set to the value of `spec.cluster.network` in the SMCP for the mesh, otherwise use <ServiceMeshPeer-name>-network. For example, if the `ServiceMeshPeer` resource for that mesh is named `west`, then the network would be named `west-network`.
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ To avoid naming conflicts between meshes, you must create separate egress and in
226226
|spec:
227227
gateways:
228228
additionalEgress:
229-
<egressName>:
229+
<egress_name>:
230230
service:
231231
metadata:
232232
labels:
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ To avoid naming conflicts between meshes, you must create separate egress and in
238238
|spec:
239239
gateways:
240240
additionalEgress:
241-
<egressName>:
241+
<egress_name>:
242242
service:
243243
ports:
244244
|Used to specify the `port:` and `name:` used for TLS and service discovery. Federation traffic consists of raw encrypted TCP for service traffic.
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ To avoid naming conflicts between meshes, you must create separate egress and in
255255
|spec:
256256
gateways:
257257
additionalIgress:
258-
<ingressName>:
258+
<ingress_name>:
259259
enabled:
260260
|This parameter enables or disables the federation ingress.
261261
|`true`/`false`
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ To avoid naming conflicts between meshes, you must create separate egress and in
265265
|spec:
266266
gateways:
267267
additionalIngress:
268-
<ingressName>:
268+
<ingress_name>:
269269
service:
270270
type:
271271
|The ingress gateway service must be exposed through a load balancer that operates at Layer 4 of the OSI model and is publicly available.
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ To avoid naming conflicts between meshes, you must create separate egress and in
275275
|spec:
276276
gateways:
277277
additionalIngress:
278-
<ingressName>:
278+
<ingress_name>:
279279
service:
280280
type:
281281
|If the cluster does not support `LoadBalancer` services, the ingress gateway service can be exposed through a `NodePort` service.
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ To avoid naming conflicts between meshes, you must create separate egress and in
285285
|spec:
286286
gateways:
287287
additionalIngress:
288-
<ingressName>:
288+
<ingress_name>:
289289
service:
290290
metadata:
291291
labels:
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ To avoid naming conflicts between meshes, you must create separate egress and in
297297
|spec:
298298
gateways:
299299
additionalIngress:
300-
<ingressName>:
300+
<ingress_name>:
301301
service:
302302
ports:
303303
|Used to specify the `port:` and `name:` used for TLS and service discovery. Federation traffic consists of raw encrypted TCP for service traffic. Federation traffic consists of HTTPS for discovery.
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ To avoid naming conflicts between meshes, you must create separate egress and in
307307
|spec:
308308
gateways:
309309
additionalIngress:
310-
<ingressName>:
310+
<ingress_name>:
311311
service:
312312
ports:
313313
nodePort:

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)