Skip to content

Short names output #35

@znicholls

Description

@znicholls

Once #30 is implemented, we'll have very verbose names. We should then add a second naming convention (maybe the naming convention definition is best placed in RCMIP and we just use it here...) which provides much shorter output names for convenience.

This follows #31 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentationenhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions