Skip to content

Should we continue to support YAML settings? #684

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
kdmccormick opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Should we continue to support YAML settings? #684

kdmccormick opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@kdmccormick
Copy link
Member

Following up from openedx/edx-platform#36224

Details TBC

@robrap
Copy link
Contributor

robrap commented Feb 26, 2025

@kdmccormick: If it turns out to be easier than you think to get to clean YAML support, would it then be ok with you? Basically, I'm wondering if your main concern is the challenge of getting there cleanly, or if you have other strong reservations as well?

@kdmccormick
Copy link
Member Author

kdmccormick commented Feb 26, 2025

There are three unknowns:

(a) How hard is it to get to "dirty" to "clean" YAML support?
(b) How much benefit comes from upstream YAML support?
(c) Do we have a volunteer to do this work, who believes that (a) is outweighed by (b)?

Hypothetically, the answer to (c) might be "no" for Axim, but could be "yes" for somebody else.

@robrap
Copy link
Contributor

robrap commented Feb 26, 2025

@kdmccormick: That's clear and helpful. I understand why you believe it will just be simpler for operators to just copy and use the code they need. That said, let's see how things look when you complete the work you know you want to do.

@kdmccormick kdmccormick self-assigned this Feb 26, 2025
kdmccormick added a commit to openedx/edx-platform that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2025
tonybusa pushed a commit to tonybusa/edx-platform that referenced this issue Apr 23, 2025
UsamaSadiq pushed a commit to openedx/edx-platform that referenced this issue May 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants