Skip to content

OMI_link should add note for implementations without physics engine #179

@lyuma

Description

@lyuma

OMI_link and OMI_seat currently depends (optionally?) on OMI_physics_body (and by extension, OMI_physics_shape).

I was worried about the dependency on OMI_physics_body reducing adoption of OMI_link which is otherwise a simple spec.

I want to add a note to OMI_link that it is acceptable to implement this and read the shape information from the physics properties, without necessitating a whole physics engine implementation.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions